At the Uniting Church Assembly we were asked to support recognition of Aboriginal Sovereignty of the land of Australia.
My initial reaction was to be concerned about the word Sovereignty.
Did this imply ownership?
Were we in for huge lawsuits claiming compensation?
Not that I oppose Aboriginal land rights but we already have Native Title.
In any case Sovereignty is a British word meaning ownership by the Crown or King it is not an Aboriginal concept.
I prayed about this fervently and I received the answer that it was not Aboriginal Sovereignty that was the problem but the concept of ownership and materialism itself.
Our European settler Sovereignty was no more valid than Aboriginal Sovereignty.
God owns the land.
We are merely custodians.
"The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants." Leviticus 25:23 (NRSV)
I believe that this concept is much closer to the Aboriginal concept of Custodianship.
Therefore I believe that Sovereignty is an inappropriate word to use.
I support Native Title and I support a Treaty.
But I don't support Sovereignty, Aboriginal or European.
[Scripture quotations (marked NRSV) are taken from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., and are used by permission. All rights reserved.]
No comments:
Post a Comment